Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - kevincooper777

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 23
Are you working there then? I'm interested... Could you e-mail me on so I can ask you questions, check if my career profile might be of interest to Caxton etc?? Best wishes, Kevin.

General Discussion / Re: Students Progress
« on: February 13, 2014, 09:34:25 PM »
Phil, I have a Y7/8/9 levels to GCSE grade conversion chart if you want to e-mail me at my SLN username at
Just after a bit of advice.  All students and all subjects at our school have been given 'flightpath' targets of expected progress.  Some of these for geography are based on the big 3 subjects and not on anything geography related.  Have any of you had to produce targets for students and expected progress in geography??  In my experience most of the progress levels wise takes place in year 8 and 9 and only some progress is made in year 9- all being exponential-  I've started but if you have experience can you share

I have to produce a flightpath target for students looking something like this
                    Year 7                    year 8                  year 9                    GCSE
                     5b                         6a                       7a                           A*
                     5c                         6b                        7b                          A

Excellent :-)

2nd can more interesting - but also I was mesmerised by the lava... will def use in lessons.

General Discussion / Re: Geology A-level resource
« on: January 13, 2014, 08:39:38 AM »
That's great,  t y

General Discussion / Re: New KS3 Curriculum
« on: January 13, 2014, 08:37:41 AM »
Couldn't agree more  :)
You really should not worry about this too much (I know that is hard):

Design your KS3 around a few things:

1. What geographies are important/engaging to your students?
2. What geographies best prepare them for GCSE study?
3. What do you and you colleagues think the students need to know about?

Do that, and your probably be following the NC, have engaged learners, good GCSE results happy SMT, staff and OFSTED.

Best wishes,


General Discussion / Re: Geology A-level resource
« on: January 07, 2014, 07:06:04 PM »
Have updated rock identification to include granodiorite, and added another interactive ppt covering all the igneous terms in the OCR Spec (assume similar to WJEC) - to get the interactivity / reveal the answers etc., you have to download...

General Discussion / Re: Greenland mining-a country divided.
« on: January 06, 2014, 09:47:39 AM »
Excellent for Edexcel B Extreme Cimates option - thank you  :)

General Discussion / You've heard of the BRICs - what about the MINTs??
« on: January 06, 2014, 09:29:00 AM »

Can you guess which 4 countries make up the MINT acronym??

NICs BRICs and MINTs, love it, good memorable acronyms.

Fascinating thought-provoking article, with relevance to so many topics - not only development, but population (advantages of a youthful population), globalisation, energy, etc. - there's even a titbit about a sinking slum in Indonesia due to over-abstraction...

Not sure about Mexico and Turkey having nearly £50K average incomes by 2050, but who knows??

I do love the way that the tired bi-polar LEDCs v MEDCs has developed (hope the new GCSE and A-level Specs reflect this!!!) - more complex now, but so much more dynamic and interesting :-)

I do wonder how much impact research / news stories like this have - i.e. will the mere suggestion that these countries are the likely places for fastest future growth lead to much greater investment and thus economic growth...?

General Discussion / Re: Old School Video Presenter Makes a Comeback ....
« on: December 12, 2013, 11:18:47 PM »
and the real one! -

seems he was at Latymer Upper, HMC school in West London

General Discussion / Re: Old School Video Presenter Makes a Comeback ....
« on: December 12, 2013, 11:04:55 PM »
question is, do you recognise him?

Excellent... good old Eliot... I always suspected he was the producer's son (producer was Len Brown) - does anyone know if that's right? Honest truth is that I and my students felt he sounded like a pompous public school boy and found that mildly irritating... not that presenting professional geography videos as a sixth former was likely very easy...

General Discussion / Re: Rasing the A* % in results
« on: December 11, 2013, 11:37:55 PM »
"I feel the able students are strong on researching case studies & retaining up to date geographies from tv, radio & other media feeds, it can give them an A edge, but only if examiners are up to speed."

For me one of the biggest sins is failing to award very able students for very sophisticated responses that accurately and appropriately go way beyond GCSE. Sometimes they not have stated the basic L1 point but have answered to AS/A level standard yet don't get out of level 1. Such answers often display an amazing level of knowledge and application of detail that in an AS/A level would have been an A grade and which more than hits the 3 required statements at level 3 for the top level at GCSE.

Nothing worse than telling able students that they need to water down their answers as they are too sophisticated to score well at GCSE.

Can't believe this happens!! - on the GCSE papers I have been involved with (Edexcel B) there is always the caveat that clearly excellent answers get top marks even if they don't jump through the particular hoops laid down as guidance for Level 3 (same with Controlled Assessment - though teachers sometimes don't seem to realise this and I have to moderate up as a result...)

General Discussion / Re: WJEC ning for GCSE - What's occurring?
« on: December 08, 2013, 12:03:28 PM »
No idea, but love the Gavin and Stacey quote  ;D

General Discussion / Re: Rasing the A* % in results
« on: December 08, 2013, 12:02:31 PM »
Kevin I am intrigued what on earth is STD?!!!
Specifics, terms, detail/development :-)

PS having just marked my students' mock, definitely agree with Stuart's comments re actually answering the question on longer/case study answers - I've obviously emphasised terms and specifics so much they forgot to actually answer the question being asked...

General Discussion / Re: Rasing the A* % in results
« on: December 04, 2013, 08:25:50 PM »
I guess these are fairly obvious points, but...
(1) really know the whole Spec - especially the key terms
(2) actually precisely answer the question being asked [including describe v explain and addressing other command words like 'compare', 'justify', etc.] - as an experienced examiner I can tell you that is actually relatively rare!
(3) be careful and accurate - e.g. in graph interpretation etc. - amazing how many 'top' students lose marks on the 'easy' Qs
(4) include good geographical terms on longer answers [especially with new emphasis on extended answers] - I tell my students to re-read their answers and ask themselves "could a 10 year old have written this?" - often the answer is 'yes' - whereas a 10 year old would not include terms like corrasion, hydraulic action, de-industrialisation, rural diversification, multiplier effect, infant mortality, NICs, aquifer over-abstraction, etc, etc.
(5) similarly include "SPECIFICS" (names, dates, numbers, etc.) - especially (but not only) when named examples are asked for - case study answers must be specific to that example, not just general points (e.g. "since 1991 when Mappleton's rock groynes were built, people living down-drift at Cowden - like Sue Earle and Shawn Mars - have seen more rapid erosion of their farms: more like 10m/yr rather than 1-2m/yr before 1991") - you get the idea...
(6) link ideas together - use conjunctions like "so...", "whereas...", "leading to..."
(7) don't waffle - you will run out of time - e.g. a 4-mark answer needs 2 explained / developed points - not 3 or 4 (which is tempting when you know a lot about something)
(8) don't leave blanks - even if some bizarre left-field Q comes up, any GCSE student worth their salt can come up with SOMETHING relevant, even if it's from their general knowledge - and if it really is "left field" (like some minor obscure part of the Spec being asked about on a 6- or 8-marker, as has happened many times in my experience), then most students will leave it blank - so any relevant point will put you 'ahead of the pack'
(9) watch your SPaG - e.g. capitals for place names
(10) complete and have marked as many past questions as possible - so that you begin to see which of these are particular areas of focus for you as a student

PS I teach my students acronyms to try and help them - RTQ for (2), PDA [pattern, detail/data, anomaly] for (3), STD for (4), (5), (6) [they like that one... a Year 8 student came up with it for me - "sir, so you want us to get STD in the exam..."]

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 23